Foundations of Boundedly Rational Choice and Satisficing Decisions
نویسنده
چکیده
Formally, the orthodox rational agent’s “Olympian” choices, as Simon has called orthodox rational choice, are made in a static framework. However, a formalization of consistent choice, underpinned by computability, suggests by, satisficing in a boundedly rational framework is not only more general than the model of “Olympian” rationality, it is also consistently dynamic. This kind of naturally process-oriented approach to the formalization of consistent choice can be interpreted and encapsulated within the framework of decision problems—in the formal sense of metamathematics and mathematical logic—which, in turn, is the natural way of formalizing the notion of Human Problem Solving in the Newell-Simon sense.
منابع مشابه
Bounded rationality and Epistemic Logic
As it is well known, there exists a chasm between the picture of perfect rationality on which modern mainstream economics is by and large built, and the limited reasoning and decision making abilities displayed by real agents. Herbert Simon groundbreaking work (cf., for instance, Simon 1955) pioneered research on bounded rationality. At the onset a study of administrative and organizational beh...
متن کاملSatisficing and maximizing consumers in a monopolistic screening model
We study a simple model in which a monopolist supplies a multi-attribute good and does not know whether the consumer is an expected-utility maximizer or a boundedly rational type that follows the satisficing heuristic proposed by Herbert Simon. We find that unless the probability of the consumer being fully rational is sufficiently high, the fact that the boundedly rational consumer never excha...
متن کاملOptimal Satisficing
Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing to explain how boundedly rational agents might approach difficult sequential decision problems. His satisficing decision makers were offered as an alternative to optimizers, who have impressive computational capacities which allow them to maximize. There is no reason, however, why satisficers can not do their task optimally. In this paper, we p...
متن کاملMaps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics
The work cited by the Nobel committee was done jointly with Amos Tversky (1937-1996) during a long and unusually close collaboration. Together, we explored the psychology of intuitive beliefs and choices and examined their bounded rationality. Herbert A. Simon (1955, 1979) had proposed much earlier that decision makers should be viewed as boundedly rational, and had offered a model in which uti...
متن کاملStudies in Classical Behavioural Economics: A Thesis Proposal
I propose to investigate the computable foundations of decision making along the lines of Classical Behavioural Economics. First, decision makers will be represented as Information Processing Systems underpinned by bounded rationality and satisficing as in the theory of Human Problem Solving proposed by Herbert Simon. The game of Go, which has a finite and large search space, provides a rich pa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- ADS
دوره 2010 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010